BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): In 1937, Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo ordered the slaughter of an estimated 20,000 Haitians living in the Dominican borderlands. The method of identification was chillingly simple: soldiers held up a sprig of parsley and asked people to name it. If they couldn’t roll the Spanish ‘R’ in perejil, they were executed immediately. This was a linguistic genocide.
I usually spend my time planning complex itineraries for the historical ruins of Rome or the DMZ in Korea, but you cannot be a serious traveler without understanding the dark histories that shape borders. While my agency, KR Booking, specializes in Italy, Korea, and the Philippines, the principles of “Dark Tourism” are universal. History is rarely clean. In the Caribbean, beneath the white sands and all-inclusive resorts, lies a scar that spans a river. The Parsley Massacre is a brutal reminder of how fragile identity—and life—can be.
To understand why this happened, you have to get into the mind of Rafael Trujillo. Known as “El Jefe,” he is one of the most brutal dictators in Latin American history. In the 1930s, the border between the Dominican Republic and Haiti was fluid. It wasn’t a hard line. It was a zone where people traded, intermarried, and lived relatively peacefully. The Dominican currency circulated in Haiti, and Haitian workers were the backbone of the Dominican sugar industry.
Trujillo hated this. He was obsessed with “Blanqueamiento” (whitening). Despite having Haitian ancestry himself (which he violently suppressed, famously using makeup to lighten his skin), he promoted a narrative that the Dominican Republic was Catholic, Spanish, and “White,” while Haiti was Voodoo, African, and “Black.” He viewed the Haitians living in the borderlands not as neighbors, but as a contaminant to his constructed national identity.
In my experience studying, dictators always need an “other” to solidify their power. For Trujillo, the “other” was the Haitian migrant. The economic depression of the 1930s gave him the excuse he needed. He painted the Haitian workers as thieves stealing jobs from Dominicans (a rhetoric that sadly echoes in politics globally today). This wasn’t just a border skirmish; it was a calculated social engineering project designed to sever the cultural limb that connected the two nations.
The prelude to the massacre wasn’t loud. It was a quiet buildup of propaganda. State-controlled newspapers began running stories about Haitian “cattle rustlers” and “invaders.” By October 1937, Trujillo was ready to act. He traveled to Dajabón and gave a speech declaring that the “occupation” by Haitians would be solved. That night, the killing started.
This is the part that chills me to the bone, both as a linguist enthusiast and a human being. The soldiers faced a problem: people in the borderlands looked similar. Dark skin was common on both sides of the river. How do you distinguish a black Dominican from a black Haitian? You check their tongue.
The test was a “Shibboleth”—a biblical term referring to a word used to distinguish members of one group from another. Dominican soldiers would hold up a sprig of parsley and ask, “¿Qué es esto?” (What is this?).
The Spanish word for parsley is Perejil. It contains the alveolar trill (the rolling ‘R’). Native speakers of Haitian Creole (Kreyòl) struggle with this sound because their language uses a uvular fricative (a sound made in the throat, similar to French). A Haitian trying to say “Perejil” would often pronounce it “Pelegil” or with a flat, guttural ‘R’.
That subtle vibration of the tongue was the difference between life and death. It is a terrifying example of how language, usually a bridge between cultures, was weaponized. As a traveler, I always encourage learning local phrases—in this context, it is a stark reminder that language is an identity marker that can be used to exclude and destroy. It wasn’t about the parsley; the parsley was just a prop. It was about the inability to perform “Dominicanness” on command.
The operation was officially known as “El Corte” (The Cutting). This name was chosen specifically because it implies the cutting of sugar cane, reducing human beings to the status of crops. But the method of killing was also significant. Trujillo ordered the army to use machetes, knives, and bayonets rather than rifles.
There were two reasons for this. First, it saved ammunition. Second, and more cynically, it allowed the government to frame the massacre as a “peasant uprising.” If the victims were hacked to death, Trujillo could claim that Dominican farmers had simply snapped and attacked their neighbors in a dispute over land. It provided plausible deniability on the international stage.
The Dajabón River marks the northern part of the border. During those days in early October 1937, the river turned red. Bodies were thrown into the water to wash them away into the Atlantic. This is why the river is often called the “Massacre River,” though some historians note it had that name from colonial times—a grim prophecy fulfilled.
The brutality was indiscriminate. Men, women, and children were targeted. I have read accounts of soldiers waiting on the bridges, testing everyone who tried to cross. It was a methodical, industrial-scale slaughter carried out with farm tools. This mirrors the intimacy of violence I’ve studied. It wasn’t a distant bomb; it was face-to-face.
What happened after the bodies washed away? Silence. The Dominican press, controlled by Trujillo, barely mentioned it. The Haitian government, led by Stenio Vincent, was initially afraid to provoke the Dominican military further. The United States, aware of the slaughter, was more concerned with keeping the Caribbean stable and anti-communist than with human rights.
Eventually, international pressure forced a negotiation. The result was insulting. Trujillo agreed to pay $750,000 in reparations to Haiti. Through corruption and bureaucracy, only about $525,000 was paid. Worse, the Haitian government took so much of the money that the survivors and families of the victims received mere pennies. The “price” of a human life in this settlement was calculated to be roughly $30.
In the Dominican Republic, the massacre was successfully buried for decades. It wasn’t taught in schools. The narrative remained that Trujillo had “secured the border.” It wasn’t until after his assassination in 1961 that the true scope of the horror began to be openly discussed. Even today, there is a segment of society that defends the action as necessary for national sovereignty.
Travel creates witnesses. When we visit these places, we are witnessing the aftermath. The town of Dajabón today is a bustling market town. On Mondays and Fridays, the gates open and thousands of Haitians cross (peacefully) to sell goods. But the tension is always there. The history is in the soil.
Why do we talk about this on a travel blog? Because “Dark Tourism” isn’t about being morbid; it’s about being aware. When I send clients, we discuss the tragedy. The same applies here. If you find yourself in the Dominican Republic, beyond the Punta Cana resorts, a trip to the border offers a profound look at Caribbean reality.
The Dajabón border market is one of the most intense cultural experiences you can have. It is chaotic, loud, and vibrant—a sharp contrast to the silence of 1937. You see the economic interdependence of the two nations. You see Dominican buyers haggling with Haitian sellers. You see the humanity that Trujillo tried to erase.
However, the legacy of Anti-Haitianismo persists. Recent years have seen mass deportations and the construction of a border wall. As a traveler, you must be observant. Notice who is serving you in the resort. Notice the police checkpoints on the bus rides. The dynamics established in 1937 are still rippling through the society today.
Visiting these sites requires respect. It is not a place for selfies. It is a place for reflection. Just as we respect the Holocaust memorials in Europe or the Killing Fields in Cambodia, we must acknowledge the Massacre River. It reminds us that the borders we cross so easily with our passports are, for others, lines drawn in blood.
Whether it’s the Colosseum’s history or the complexity of the Caribbean, we plan trips for travelers who want to understand the world.
Get Your Detailed Historical Itinerary Now!It was a linguistic shibboleth chosen for its phonetic difficulty. The Spanish word Perejil (Parsley) contains an alveolar trill (a rolled ‘R’) and a velar fricative (the ‘j’ sound). Native speakers of Haitian Creole typically use a uvular fricative (a sound made in the back of the throat) for ‘R’, similar to French.
Under the extreme stress of a soldier holding a machete, mimicking a foreign accent is nearly impossible. The inability to produce the vibration of the ‘R’ immediately marked the speaker as Haitian. It was a quick, cheap, and effective way for the army to filter the population without checking documents.
The exact number will likely never be known due to the remote location, the method of body disposal (river dumping and mass graves), and the government cover-up. Historians’ estimates vary significantly.
Conservative estimates place the death toll around 12,000 to 15,000. Higher estimates, including those from Haitian sources, suggest up to 35,000 victims. The consensus among modern historians usually settles around 20,000 deaths. The lack of records was intentional; Trujillo wanted to erase not just the people, but the evidence of their existence.
The response was tragically muted. In 1937, the world was on the brink of WWII. The United States, under FDR, was pursuing the “Good Neighbor Policy” and wanted to maintain stability in the Caribbean to prevent German influence.
While the U.S. State Department was horrified by the reports, they opted for diplomacy over intervention. They brokered a compensation deal where the Dominican government agreed to pay $750,000. Trujillo eventually paid only about $525,000 (roughly $30 per victim). Corrupt officials in the Haitian government stole much of this money, meaning the families of the victims received almost nothing. No international tribunal was ever held.
Yes. The town of Dajabón is accessible to tourists and is the main border crossing in the north. The Dajabón River (Massacre River) separates Dajabón from the Haitian town of Ouanaminthe.
There are no large, official museums dedicated to the massacre in Dajabón, which is telling of the lingering political sensitivity. However, there are small memorials and the “Gate of the Frontier.” Visiting the binational market on Mondays and Fridays is the best way to see the site. It is a place of intense commerce and human interaction, standing in stark contrast to the violence of the past.
The motivation was a mix of racism, economics, and totalitarian control. Trujillo was driven by an ideology of “Anti-Haitianismo.” He believed that the Dominican Republic should be defined by its Spanish, Catholic, and “White” heritage, distinct from the African, Voodoo, and “Black” heritage of Haiti.
He viewed the porous border as a threat to his absolute control. By eliminating the Haitian population in the borderlands, he aimed to “nationalize” the frontier and enforce a rigid cultural separation. It was a classic example of scapegoating: blaming economic struggles on a marginalized immigrant group to rally nationalist support.
Don't have an account? Sign Up
